THE SHIT WINE GUIDE

The Hall of Shame

A permanent record of the most questionable moments in wine.

Legendary disappointments, catastrophic tastings and extraordinary pricing failures, preserved for future consideration.

The Hall

Eight inductees. None proud.

Each entry is graded by the Overall Disappointment Index, in Dregs, and awarded a verdict by the Institution’s Standing Committee on Regret.

Château Grandiloquent-Morne “Millennial Reserve” 1998Inducted 2001
Extraordinary Pricing Failure

Château Grandiloquent-Morne “Millennial Reserve” 1998

Incident year 1998

Offered at £4,200 per bottle to commemorate the Millennium, the Reserve was described by the Institution’s tasting panel as “warm, wet and faintly municipal.” The accompanying certificate of authenticity was found to be more convincing than the wine, and several panellists asked to keep it.

0Dregs · ODI
The Institution’s verdictPrice: monumental. Contents: pond.
The Halvern Summit Decanter IncidentInducted 2021
Unnecessary Pretension

The Halvern Summit Decanter Incident

Incident year 2014

An entire dinner of 140 delegates was delayed by eighty minutes while a 1960s decanter was ceremonially rotated, presented and discussed. The wine inside, a modest table red, was served at last in a silence of such depth that the sommelier apologised to nobody in particular.

0Dregs · ODI
The Institution’s verdictEighty minutes for a table red.
Domaine de la Presque-Rien “Cuvée Intention”Inducted 2014
Bottle That Promised Everything

Domaine de la Presque-Rien “Cuvée Intention”

Incident year 2011

The label, heavy and embossed, promised “a conversation between earth and sky.” The wine, upon opening, was found to be the earth’s end of the conversation only, and an extremely brief one. Sales were nonetheless strong in the first year.

0Dregs · ODI
The Institution’s verdictA conversation with only one participant.
The Sommelier’s Soliloquy DinnerInducted 2026
Unnecessary Pretension

The Sommelier’s Soliloquy Dinner

Incident year 2019

A nine-course tasting menu at which each wine was introduced with a monologue averaging seven minutes. By the fifth course the guests had formed a delegation. By the seventh, a committee. The eighth wine was drunk in a spirit of solidarity.

0Dregs · ODI
The Institution’s verdictSeven minutes per glass; the wine was not consulted.
The Great Pour-Over at the Brightwater GalaInducted 2019
Catastrophic Tasting Experience

The Great Pour-Over at the Brightwater Gala

Incident year 2016

During a gala for 600 guests, a ceremonial pour-over of a prized vintage was carried out upon the guest of honour, the head table and, by a series of unfortunate deflections, the string quartet. The vintage was subsequently rated “excellent, wherever it was.”

0Dregs · ODI
The Institution’s verdictThe finest wine in the room was on the carpet.
The Vertical That Wasn’tInducted 2015
Legendary Disappointment

The Vertical That Wasn’t

Incident year 2008

Twelve consecutive vintages were assembled by a private collector for what was billed as the finest vertical tasting in a generation. Upon opening, all twelve were found to be the same wine, in the same bottle, under twelve different labels. The collector described the event as “consistent.”

0Dregs · ODI
The Institution’s verdictTwelve years, one wine.
The Corked ConsensusInducted 2012
Catastrophic Tasting Experience

The Corked Consensus

Incident year 2009

In the course of a formal blind tasting, all fourteen panellists identified the same fault and agreed upon it with unusual enthusiasm. It was later discovered that the fault was not in the wine but in the room, and in particular the carpet, which had been cleaned that morning.

0Dregs · ODI
The Institution’s verdictUnanimous, and wrong about the room.
The Cloche of Perpetual PreservationInducted 2026
Extraordinary Pricing Failure

The Cloche of Perpetual Preservation

Incident year 2019

Sealed under a glass dome in 1971 and unveiled with ceremony in 2019 for a reserve price of £11,500, the bottle was opened before an audience of 80. The contents were unanimously described as “deliberate.” The dome has since been sold separately and has performed well.

0Dregs · ODI
The Institution’s verdictThe dome outperformed the wine.

Criteria for induction

What the Standing Committee considers

Magnitude

The scale of the disappointment, measured in Dregs and the number of people who were told.

Pretension

The ratio of ceremony to wine, assessed by a Committee that has seen a great deal of ceremony.

Price Disparity

The distance between what was paid and what was poured, expressed as a ratio and a sigh.

Memorability

The likelihood that the incident will be described at a dinner, at length, for the rest of the participants’ lives.

The Overall Disappointment IndexNominate an incident (Members)